Tomokazu Matsuyama Japan, b. 1976
Runner, 2021
Stainless steel
96 x 36 x 36 in
243.8 x 91.4 x 91.4 cm
243.8 x 91.4 x 91.4 cm
Editions of 3 + 1 AP
8162
Further images
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 1
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 2
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 3
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 4
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 5
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 6
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 7
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 8
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 9
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 10
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 11
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 12
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 13
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 14
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 15
)
-
(View a larger image of thumbnail 16
)
This sculpture, titled Runner, debuted in The Best Part About Us, Tomokazu Matsuyama’s 2022 solo exhibition at Kavi Gupta gallery in Chicago. The form is highly abstracted, offering not so...
This sculpture, titled Runner, debuted in The Best Part About Us, Tomokazu Matsuyama’s 2022 solo exhibition at Kavi Gupta gallery in Chicago. The form is highly abstracted, offering not so much a narrative expression of a runner, but rather a poetic incarnation of certain ideas about the function and cultural meaning of running as part of human culture. Viewed from certain angles, the sculpture reveals aspects of a human form, such as a head, arms, and feet that don a pair of athletic shoes. Other aspects of the form are intended to convey movement and action.
This work is a companion to a sculpture titled Dancer. Matsuyama placed these two forms in the same space as an expression of how dancing and running are separate activities that nonetheless express similar human interests. Dancing is more prevalent in Eastern Culture, while running is more a part of Western culture. Nonetheless both activities allow people to express similar human ideals.
Matsuyama’s sculptural practice is informed by his process of questioning how his imagery might be experienced by viewers in three-dimensional space. He contemplates the total optical experience of his paintings and the logical relationships of the formal elements within them, creating mirrored forms and patterns that serve as an optical metaphor for his vision of cultural exchange and influence. The effect event extends beyond the piece, as its surfaces will take on the colors of its environment.
The uncanny process of recognizing the unfamiliar plays out in the presence of Matsuyama’s sculptures. Simultaneously familiar and alien, they hint exquisitely at the worlds we know, not from life but from a dream. Hand welded from sheets of stainless steel and hand buffed to a mirror shine, these fragmented, labyrinthine forms are frozen in gestures that, again, relate to the “global us.” One, Matsuyama says, is a runner; another, a dancer. “Jogging is part of the Western experience. Dancing originates with Eastern culture. Both keep us mentally and physically connected,” he says.
In their distorted, curvilinear surfaces we see ourselves and wonder, like a glimpse into the Matrix, which side of the mirror is real.
That curiosity is essential to Matsuyama’s practice, as he invites us into an ever-evolving, global cultural conversation across a complex web of memories, visual languages, histories, dreams, and expectations.
This is seen dramatically with his Shinjuku Station installation Hanao-san, around which Matsuyama painted the ground with broad swaths of color to be reflected up onto the piece, or with the Meiji Shrine installation of Wheels of Fortune, which nearly camouflaged the piece, reflecting the complexity of nature across its perfect industrial surfaces. The works taking on their environments actively feels analogous to the way in which a person absorbs the culture around them, and perhaps in a hyper-literal sense is an optical illustration of how an artwork is affected by the context of its presentation.
This work is a companion to a sculpture titled Dancer. Matsuyama placed these two forms in the same space as an expression of how dancing and running are separate activities that nonetheless express similar human interests. Dancing is more prevalent in Eastern Culture, while running is more a part of Western culture. Nonetheless both activities allow people to express similar human ideals.
Matsuyama’s sculptural practice is informed by his process of questioning how his imagery might be experienced by viewers in three-dimensional space. He contemplates the total optical experience of his paintings and the logical relationships of the formal elements within them, creating mirrored forms and patterns that serve as an optical metaphor for his vision of cultural exchange and influence. The effect event extends beyond the piece, as its surfaces will take on the colors of its environment.
The uncanny process of recognizing the unfamiliar plays out in the presence of Matsuyama’s sculptures. Simultaneously familiar and alien, they hint exquisitely at the worlds we know, not from life but from a dream. Hand welded from sheets of stainless steel and hand buffed to a mirror shine, these fragmented, labyrinthine forms are frozen in gestures that, again, relate to the “global us.” One, Matsuyama says, is a runner; another, a dancer. “Jogging is part of the Western experience. Dancing originates with Eastern culture. Both keep us mentally and physically connected,” he says.
In their distorted, curvilinear surfaces we see ourselves and wonder, like a glimpse into the Matrix, which side of the mirror is real.
That curiosity is essential to Matsuyama’s practice, as he invites us into an ever-evolving, global cultural conversation across a complex web of memories, visual languages, histories, dreams, and expectations.
This is seen dramatically with his Shinjuku Station installation Hanao-san, around which Matsuyama painted the ground with broad swaths of color to be reflected up onto the piece, or with the Meiji Shrine installation of Wheels of Fortune, which nearly camouflaged the piece, reflecting the complexity of nature across its perfect industrial surfaces. The works taking on their environments actively feels analogous to the way in which a person absorbs the culture around them, and perhaps in a hyper-literal sense is an optical illustration of how an artwork is affected by the context of its presentation.
17
of
17